Lumper receipts templates free drivers#
Lumper receipts templates free driver#
Lumper receipts templates free code#
Lumper receipts templates free professional#

The Eighth Circuit found that the case was one of first impression that is, apparently no other court had addressed the issue.

Lumper receipts templates free drivers#

OOIDA appealed to the Eighth Circuit and argued, in part, that Supervalu, had an В“unqualified dutyВ…to provide compensationВ…В” to drivers who are required to use unloading services. Second, the district court concluded that judgment in SupervaluВ’s favor was proper because OOIDA had not proven that the drivers were not reimbursed for lumping services. In a series of rulings concerning cross-motions for summary judgment (each party argued it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law), the district court first concluded that under section 14704 a suit for money damages could not be maintained based upon the plain language of the statute. Finally, Supervalu argued the drivers were only entitled to injunctive relief under section 14704.

Lumper receipts templates free code#

Supervalu argued, alternatively, that even if drivers were required to hire SupervaluВ’s lumpers, OOIDA could not prove a violation of the code section because the drivers were reimbursed by shippers.

Lumper receipts templates free driver#

Supervalu argued that drivers maintained the right to unload provided the driver maintained the minimum required insurance. OOIDAВ’s theory was that В“SupervaluВ’s insurance-coverage requirement effectively required OOIDA drivers to purchase SupervaluВ’s new lumping services, in violation of В§ 14103(a).В” Id. Nonetheless, OOIDA continued with the lawsuit. As a result of the suit, Supervalu decreased the required amount to match federal law. The facts reflect that SupervaluВ’s coverage requirements В“significantly exceedВ” those required by 49 U.S.C.

Lumper receipts templates free professional#

In 2005, Supervalu implemented a policy which required that drivers either use SupervaluВ’s professional lumpers or be subject to certain insurance requirements established by Supervalu. The facts of the case demonstrate that members of the OOIDA along with the OOIDA brought suit alleging that SupervaluВ’s practices violated 49 U.S.C. As the case involves the application of federal lawby the Eighth Circuit, the opinion is binding on other federal district courts in the Eighth CircuitВ–such as the Iowa based federal courts. in the United States District Court for Minnesota. along with others brought suit against Supervalu, Inc. The Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Association, Inc. Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Association, Inc. What is the recourse at this point, well not now but going forward how should I handle this situation?ДЄ recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit will be of interest to those involved in the transportation industry. So, long story short: I did the work, (only charged for the 3rd and 4th drops) got my tcheck that day, turned in my receipts and about a month later the company I'm leased to called me and said I was being hit with a charge back for the lumper, because I didn't turn in a receipt from the lumper service at the facility! I talked with the broker and explained to them that you got the receipts from me because I did the work! At this point the work is done.so you're saying I did this for work for free?

First I ask the lumper service for their estimate and I go off of that as to what I call in the tcheck for to the broker. Of course I already know that you can't be forced to hire a lumper so when the work isn't to exhaustive I'll do it myself and make the money.

2nd stop was in Jersey at a cross dock who pulled the 10 themselves.

I pulled it no problem and was on my way. I pulled a load out of NH with 4 drops back during the powder (snow) season. Ok, this actually happened to me a few months back but a situation I had the other day brought it back to my memory.